Responsible subjects and discourse causality. How mental spaces and perspective help identifying subjectivity in Dutch backward causal connectives
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Basic Communicative Spaces Network (BCSN – Sanders et al., 2009) accounts for crucial semantic–pragmatic characteristics of causal relations expressed by frequently used Dutch causal connectives. BCSN integrates subjectivity theory, domain theory, and mental spaces theory to explain their linguistic categorization. Starting with the original three-way classification of content, epistemic, and speech act use, BCSN represents different uses in separate but connected and embedded mental spaces that are linked to the Subject of Consciousness (SoC), who is present as an actor or concluder in many causal relations. The analytic structure of BCSN explains the contrasts between the backward Dutch causal connectives WANT ‘because/for/since’, signaling speech act and epistemic relations in which the speaker is the implicit SoC, and OMDAT ‘because (of the fact that)’, typically expressing content relations with an explicit SoC. This division of labor corresponds to a cognitive categorization in terms of BCSN. On a more general level, BCSN offers a model for the recursive patterning that characterizes perspective alternation in natural discourse, since the BCSN represents both the author’s subjectivity and the subjectivity of other actors in the discourse (such as speakers and characters in a narration), as well as the blends between these perspectives. The analysis is illustrated with corpus examples. 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
منابع مشابه
Causality and subjectivity in discourse: The meaning and use of causal connectives in spontaneous conversation, chat interactions and written text
Many languages of the world have connectives to express causal rela tions at the discourse level. Often, language users systematically prefer one lexi cal item (because) over another (even highly similar) one (since) to express a causal relationship. Such choices provide a window on speakers’ cognitive cate gorizations, and have been modeled in previous work in terms of subjectivity. However...
متن کاملAutomatic techniques to analyze connectives 1 Running head :
In this paper we explore the possibility of using automatic techniques to analyze the use of backward causal connectives in large Dutch newspaper corpora. With the help of two techniques, Latent Semantic Analysis and Thematic Text Analysis , the contexts of more than 14,000 connectives were studied. The method of analysis is described. It is found that differences that have been suggested in th...
متن کاملStudying the Semantic Context of two Dutch Causal Connectives
We aim to study the difference of usage between two causal connectives in their semantic context. We present an ongoing study of two Dutch backward causal connectives omdat and want. Previous linguistic research has shown that causal constructions with want are more subjective and often express an opinion. Our hypothesis is that the left and right context surrounding the connectives are more se...
متن کاملOn The Use Of Automatic Tools For Large-Scale Semantic Analyses Of Causal Connectives
In this paper we describe the (annotation) tools underlying two automatic techniques to analyse the meaning and use of backward causal connectives in large Dutch newspaper corpora. With the help of these techniques, Latent Semantic Analysis and Thematic Text Analysis, the contexts of more than 14,000 connectives were studied. We will focus here on the methods of analysis and on the fairly strai...
متن کاملMinimally Supervised Event Causality Identification
This paper develops a minimally supervised approach, based on focused distributional similarity methods and discourse connectives, for identifying of causality relations between events in context. While it has been shown that distributional similarity can help identifying causality, we observe that discourse connectives and the particular discourse relation they evoke in context provide additio...
متن کامل